12 years after the diary's publication, Fria Order, a magazine published by Swedish National Federation, released a couple of articles about the diary, arguing that it was impossible for a girl that young to have written the text in that fashion and style. In addition, around that time, some documents from the New York Supreme Court appeared, confirming that Otto Frank had to pay the American-Jewish author Meyer Levin $50,000 “because he had used the dialogue of [Levin] just as it was an ‘implanted’ it in the diary as being his daughter’s intellectual work."
The Anne Frank Foundation changed the legal information on the diary and added Otto Frank as co-author. Naturally, this sparked controversy over the authenticity of the text once again. Yves Kugelmann, a board member of the Anne Frank Foundation, stated that Otto was to be named co-author because he had created “a new work by editing, merging, and trimming entries from the diary and notebooks and reshaping them into a ‘kind of collage’.” So, does this lessen the text's value or importance?
Lies being taught;
Anne Frank was victim of Holocaust who was a brave girl and kept a diary of her ordeal during Holocaust which narrates horrors of Holocaust.
Now the truth;
A New York Court awarded $50,000 to an American novelist Meyer Levin, to be paid By Otto Frank the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's novel "Diary of a Young Girl" also known as "Diary of Anne Frank". Mr. Otto Frank, had promised to pay to a Jewish novelist Meyer Levin not less than $50,000 because he had used the literary creation of author Levin in toto, and represented it to his publisher and the public as his late daughter’s original work.
Levin’s involvement with the Diary began in August 1950 when his wife, writer Tereska Torres, gave him a copy as a present. He was a forty-four-year-old novelist, 18 The literal translation of this is “The House Behind: Diary Letters from 14 June 1942 – 1 August 1944.” 24 journalist and freelance writer who had been sent to France during the war as a battle correspondent and was one of the first Americans to see the newly-liberated concentration camps. He had been transformed by what he had witnessed and became possessed with a desire to tell the story of the Holocaust (Lee, 2002: 187). Simultaneously, he knew that he could never tell the story himself and that only those who had undergone the Holocaust had the right to do so: “Some day [sic] a teller would arise from amongst themselves.” (1950: 174) Torres gave him the Diary knowing of his desire to find such a ‘teller’, and Levin “fell in love with it.”19 He wrote to Otto Frank and suggested the possibility of adapting the diary into a play and/or film. Initially Otto was hesitant but Levin persuaded him that it was at least worth attempting. Levin began a personal campaign to assist Otto in getting the diary published in America, which resulted in his becoming Otto’s unofficial literary agent, and in March 1951 Otto accepted a publishing deal with Doubleday (Lee, 2002: 196). In March 1952 Levin was assigned to review the Diary for the New York Times Book Review. He “was confident the diary would find someone to transfer it to the stage […] and hoped Otto would send any enquiries he received about it on to him, since he felt he could write the adaptation.” (Ibid, 198) This is apparently the first time that Levin explicitly stated his wish to adapt the Diary to Otto, and this was fortified by Levin’s offer to step aside as agent as his real desire was to undertake the actual writing. Levin’s review in the New York Times came out in June and is credited with making people “‘race out to read the diary’” (ibid, 200). When the Diary was published on 16 June 1952, every copy of the five thousand printed had been sold by the afternoon, with a further fifteen thousand being rushed through: “By late afternoon, theatrical agents, producers and television executives had converged upon Doubleday […] demanding to know who they should contact for dramatic rights.” (Lee, 2002: 201).
Otto Frank later decided on a Broadway production of the same novel but did not pay Meyer Levin for use of his novel for Broadway production whcih was against the terms of contract. hence Meyer Levin sued Otto Frank for his writings, and the New York Court Jury awarded Meyer Levin $50,000, for his 'intellectual work'.
The Jury awarded $ 50,000 dollars as compensation to be paid by Otto Frank father of Anne Frank to Jew novelist Meyer Levin who wrote Diary of Anne Frank. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law as it was not based upon "legal" evidence of loss. The reason was that if Writer Meyer levin had written the said novel under his own name and sold it as it was a fiction, then it would not have sold so many copies. Because Otto Frank father of Anne frank gave this fictional novel name of his dead daughter and projected to gullible public as “real” story of Anne Frank that so many copies were sold and windfall profits were made. However in further appeal against the order of Judge Coleman, by Jewish novelist Meyer Levin matter was compromised out of court between the parties.
Jewish writer Meyer Levin had approached the Court for his claim for damages on account of writing the “Diary of Anne Frank”, He had also won his case from the Jury, He would not have withdrawn his Appeal had he not been paid out of court by Otto Frank, to avoid media publicity. So Otto Frank did pay Jewish writer Meyer Levin $ 50,000 dollars or thereabout for writing ‘Diary of Anne Frank’.
Complete details of the case are available in case titled Meyer Levin Vs Otto Frank, File number 2241-1956 in the New York County Clerk’s office.
In 1980, Otto Frank sued two Germans, Ernst Romer and Edgar Geiss, for distributing literature denouncing the diary as a forgery. The trial produced a study by official German state forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA] forensically examined the manuscript, which at that point in time consisted of three hardbound notebooks and 324 loose pages bound in a fourth notebook, with special forensic equipment. In the end, BKA clearly determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's handwriting. The bureau determined that everything in the diary was written by the same person. The person that wrote the diaries had used a ballpoint pen throughout. Unfortunately for Herr Frank, the ballpoint pen was not available until October 1945 whereas Anne was known to have died of typhus in 1944.
The German magazine, Der Spiegel, published an account of this report stating that;-
(a) some editing postdated 1951;
(b) Experts had held that all the writing in the journal was by the same hand; and thus –
(c) the entire diary was a postwar fake.
The diary of Anne frank is written in Ball point pen. Ball point pen was invented by László Bíró, in 1938. In 1940 the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, moved to Argentina and on June 10 filed for its patent. It was first made available in USA on 29 October 1945 at New York's Gimbles Department store when more tha 5000 pens were entire stock of ball point pens was sold at then cost of $ 12.50 each. Children were never allowed to use Ball point pen till several years later as it destroyed their hand writing.
Millions of humans world wide were fed a fiction by Jew Otto Frank for the sake of money is nothing new. In any case it was not the fault of Anne Frank. She had not done anything wrong. She had not even written any diary.
Note by author;-
What everybody believes in, is that Jewish Writer Meyer Levin had impersonated Anne frank, the extent of impersonation is in doubt whether it was ‘X’ % or ‘Y’%. To my mind if impersonation is accepted then whether it is in part or in whole is immaterial. Even those who believe that Anne Frank wrote part of diary also believe that her father tore off part of her diary which was favorable to Nazi regime and unfavorable to her own family particularly unfavorable to her own father Otto Frank. So whether it is a case of half truth or full lies, the diary has to be denounced as fake.
Secondly If Meyer Levin had not written the first part someone who was “paid well” might have, receipt properly taken and no cause for a court case !!!
Thirdly where is the case for profits, such instances come dime a dozen in:-
a) All 70 + Countries attacked and enslaved for world domination British where every household suffered similar fate in the hands of their British masters.
b) Treatment of slaves in America or treatment of US native inhabitants by European immigrants or Jews who are ruling US today.
c) Treatment of slaves by Europeans. The bible mentions that the Jews went into slavery. Deuteronomy 28:68 and they had yokes of iron put around their necks. Deuteronomy 28:48
d) Every place which has suffered slavery has worst diaries, except that in those countries slaves do not own the media.
Lastly in some countries denial of holocaust / or Anne frank diary is illegal. In some cities particularly in Amsterdam such diaries have been used to generate massive tourism and made a source of revenue. Such cities / countries or their “courts of law” will jealously defend the diary and will prosecute to the extent of bankruptcy anyone and everyone who publicly denies the diary as a fraud. However such prosecution has nothing to do with upholding the truth but more to protect the revenue illegally earned over last fifty five years. A case in hand is that of David Irwing. Another is Julian Assange, who has been persecuted for publishing truth in Wikileaks. Nobody has challenged the truth in Wikileaks yet Julian Assange has been persecuted to the extent of bankruptcy.
Freedom can mean freedom of expression or freedom to sway the masses by the money power of political donations, or having your own chosen one as a puppet President 'who' then decides on judges most of whom dance to moneyers behind their appointments.